About
About the Firm Our Team Reviews
Services
All Services Philanthropy & Legacy Foundations We Support
Articles & FAQ
All Articles Recent Commentary Common Questions (FAQ)
Resources
Elder Law Resources Trusted Partners
Client Center
Intake Questionnaires Client Portal (Clio)
Legal Technology Free Consultation
← Back to All Articles
Retirement · Social Security · Long-Term Care Planning

Social Security Is Running Out Faster Than You Think — Here’s What It Means for Your Retirement

Every year, the Social Security Trustees release a report telling us how long the money will last. For years, the answer hovered around 2033 or 2034 — close enough to worry about, but far enough away that most people stopped reading by the second paragraph.

This year’s report is different.

The 2026 Trustees Report, released June 9th, moved the depletion date for the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund to the fourth quarter of 2032. At that point, incoming payroll tax revenue would cover only 78% of scheduled benefits — unless Congress acts. For someone receiving $2,000 a month, that is a cut of around $440, every single month. Research from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates average monthly benefit cuts could reach $500, with larger losses in more than half the states.

I want to be clear about something that gets lost in the headlines: Social Security is not going bankrupt. Workers and employers would still be paying payroll taxes, and that money would still flow into the system. The issue is that after the trust fund reserves are depleted, incoming revenue would not be enough to pay every promised dollar.

The lights stay on. The checks keep coming. They are just smaller — unless Congress does something about it.
What a 22% Cut Looks Like

A retiree receiving $2,000 per month would see benefits reduced to roughly $1,560 — a loss of about $5,280 per year.

$2,000/month × 22% = $440/month · $5,280/year

For a married couple where both spouses receive an average benefit, the combined loss approaches $10,000 a year. For families already stretching to cover long-term care costs, that is not a rounding error. That is the difference between a plan that works and one that doesn’t.

Why 2032 and Not 2033?

The depletion date moved up due to a combination of factors. The Social Security Fairness Act eliminated the Windfall Elimination Provision, increasing benefits for millions of public-sector retirees. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act — the same law that reshaped Medicaid — created a new senior deduction that lowers the income taxes many beneficiaries pay on their Social Security, reducing revenue flowing back into the trust fund. And higher-than-expected inflation has driven larger cost-of-living adjustments.

Underneath those policy changes are longer-term demographic pressures: an aging population, lower birth rates, and slower workforce growth all reduce the ratio of workers paying into the system relative to retirees drawing benefits. These are not temporary disruptions. They are structural.

This Has Happened Before

In 1983, Congress avoided looming across-the-board benefit reductions by enacting changes to the program to extend its solvency. It was a genuine political crisis, and Washington solved it at the last minute. Maybe they will again. I hope so. But I would not build a retirement plan around that hope.

What This Means for My Clients

I see this playing out in our practice every day. Families come in planning on Social Security as a foundational income source — and it should be. But when that foundation is uncertain, everything built on top of it becomes uncertain too. Long-term care costs, nursing home expenses, community spouse allowances — all of it gets harder when the baseline income shrinks.

The families who navigate this best are the ones who plan for multiple scenarios. That means treating Social Security as one income source among several, not the only one. It means making decisions about when to claim benefits with the potential for a future reduction in mind. And it means doing the Medicaid and asset protection planning that protects your other resources — because if benefits are cut and nursing home costs are not, the gap has to come from somewhere.

Six years sounds like a long time. It is not.

The 5-year Medicaid look-back period alone means that any asset protection planning you want fully in place before 2032 needs to start now — not when the headlines get worse. The planning window and the depletion date are nearly the same length. That is not a coincidence worth ignoring.

Planning as if benefits will be exactly what they are today is the riskiest assumption you can make.

The Bottom Line

Congress may fix this. The political will has existed before, and the stakes are high enough that it may exist again. But the history of Washington suggests that the fix, if it comes, will come late — and may involve benefit reductions, revenue increases, or both.

If you have questions about how Social Security fits into your broader retirement and long-term care plan — or how to protect what you have built — we are here. That is what we do.

LS
Leonard L. Shober, J.D., LL.M.
Founding Attorney · Shober & Rock, P.C.

Len graduated with honors from Temple University School of Law and completed his Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Taxation at Temple in 1994. He has concentrated his practice in elder law, Medicaid planning, and estate planning for over 30 years. Before law school, he worked as a social worker and family therapist — a background that shapes how he works with families navigating the legal and emotional dimensions of long-term care. Shober & Rock, P.C. is located in Chalfont, Pennsylvania and serves families throughout Bucks County and the surrounding region.

Wondering how Social Security fits into your long-term care plan?

Every family’s situation is different. A brief conversation is the best way to understand how the new projections affect your retirement income, your Medicaid options, and the planning you should be doing now.

Schedule a Free Consultation